Bible Encyclopedias
Haf?arah

The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia

That portion of the Prophets read immediately after the reading of the Torah in the morning services on Sabbaths, feast-days, and the Ninth of Ab, and in the afternoon services on fast-days. The passage chosen usually contains an explicit reference to some event described in the section previously read from the Torah; for instance, Isaiah 54, on account of verse 9, goes with Genesis 6:9-11:32; Hosea 12:13 with Genesis 28:10-32:2; Micah 5:6-6:8 with Num.- In all of these cases the direct relation of one passage to the other is limited to one verse. Often the two sections bear merely a general resemblance to each other in their content, as is the case with those for most feast-days, those for the four Sabbaths before the Feast of Passover, etc. For example, 2 Kings 4, on account of verse 16, goes with Genesis 18-; 1 Kings 1 with Genesis 23-25:18, on account of 24:1, with which the weekly lesson originally began; Judges 13 with Numbers 4:21-7:89, on account of 6:1 et seq. Sometimes, when nothing more appropriate could be found, a remote similarity of ideas determined the selection of the haf?arah: thus, Isaiah 42:5 would be coupled with Genesis 1-6:8; Ezekiel 37:15 with Genesis 44:18-47:27; indeed, sometimes the connection consists only in one word, as between Hosea 2:2 and Numbers 1-4:20; Isaiah 27:6 and Exodus 1:5. The haf?arot are definitely fixed; they consist of from ten to fifty-two verses, and are read by the last person called upon by the prayer-leader or the rabbi to read from the Torah. They are preceded by two exordiums on the subject of God's delight in His prophets and their utterances and in the Torah, and are concluded by four laudations�upon God's faithfulness to His promises in regard to the restoration of Zion, the coming of the Messiah, and the reestablishment of the throne of David, upon the revelation of the Torah, upon the Prophets, and upon the feast-day.

Stages of Development.

The haf?arah has passed through several stages of development (see LITURGY). The Talmudic sources, which trace the custom of reading from the Torah back to Moses and Ezra, do not mention the originator of the haf?arah, which would seem to point to a later origin. Abudarham, a Spanish teacher of the fourteenth century, traces the haf?arah back to the time of the persecution under Antiochus IV., Epiphanes (168-165 B.C.), when, owing to the prohibition against reading from the Torah, the corresponding sections from the Prophets were read instead, this practise becoming established as a custom. Although all authority for this explanation is lacking, it is not improbable that the custom dates from the pre-Christian era, and that originally it was observed only on feast-days and on the four special Sabbaths, and was later extended to all Sabbaths. It appears that the Pharisees in their conflict with the Sadducees read in connection with the various sections from the Torah such selections from the prophetical books�principally from the so-called Earlier Prophets�as supported their own interpretation of the laws concerning the festivals. Talmudic statements, together with Luke 4:17, show that the reading of the haf?arah on the Sabbath had already been instituted in the first century of the common era (Meg. 25b; Yer. Meg. 4:75c; Tosef., 4:34), although the selections at that time were by no means fixed (Meg. 4:9).

Triennial Cycle.

The portions to be read on feast-days were first determined in the middle of the second century (Tosef., Meg. 4:1); then followed those for the special Sabbaths; for ordinary Sabbaths only a few were fixed, which bore special relation to the sections from the Torah (Tosef., Meg. 4:18). In the second century the choice of the passage was still left to the scholar who was called upon to read from the Torah (Meg. 4:5). In Palestine the reading of the Prophets was completed in three years, in accordance with the three-year cycle of readings from the Torah, and consequently necessitated as many selections as there were weeks in the three years. A manuscript in the Bodleian Library contains an incomplete list of these, which manuscript came originally from a synagogue in Cairo, probably of the Palestinians, who in the twelfth century still observed the triennial cycle. These haf?arot consisted often of two or three verses, as in the oldest times, and were repeated in Aramaic, the language of the people, by an official translator, sentence by sentence, as they were read (Meg. 4:4). Inappropriate passages remained untranslated. At times an address followed the reading from the Prophets (comp. Luke 4:17 et seq., and Pesi?ta), usually based upon the section from the Torah. In the course of time the haf?arah grew (comp. Meg. 31a). When the triennial cycle was replaced in Babylonia by an annual cycle, and each three sections of the Torah were read as one, the haf?arah to the first section was usually preserved, seldom that of the second or third, which is explained by the similarity of the rites in this respect. The Karaites almost always chose the haf?arah to the middle section. The haf?arot for the three Sabbaths of mourning before the Ninth of Ab and for the three Sabbaths of consolation after the Ninth of Ab, which have no connection with the section from the Torah, are later, though probably of Palestinian origin; for the former, admonitory speeches are chosen from Jeremiah 1- and Isaiah 1; for the latter, consolatory speeches from Isa. - The haf?arot of consolation were later made to extend over the following Sabbaths to the New-Year, and attained such importance that the homilies of the preacher touched only upon the haf?arah and not upon the Torah (Pesi?ta). However, the extension beyond the three haf?arot of consolation did not at first find general recognition, and not until later did it become prevalent. The benedictions preceding and following the haf?arah are first found in the Palestinian treatise Soferim (13:9-14), and, with some variations, in the prayer-book of the gaon Amram of Babylonia (900). For the accents of the haf?arah see Jew. Encyc. 3:540-546, s. CANTILLATION, Nos. 3-8.